Is the
assessment title, format and submission time/date clear?
|
Does it explicitly
address precise LOs, so it fits the purpose?
|
Have I
discussed this method/format, due date, word count and the exact LOs
addressed, with my other programme/team members (to avoid repetition or
testing the same skills)? Is there a balance of formative/summative,
individual/peer/group work?
|
Is this assignment
different from past ones (UH UPRs, 2012) yet has global accessibility? Can I be
more innovative, whilst in line with the DMD? (e.g. allow
students to choose method: report/video/ poster)
|
If a choice is
possible, are the options clearly marked with relevant marks shown?
Are all
instructions clear, specific and concise (max. 2 pages) with the latest FULL
details in the Module Guide?
Are penalties,
online/submission procedures, feedback information included? Ensure collaborative
and individual work is identifiable.
Can students
see how this assignment contributes to the Module, with (%) worth, hours on
task and instructions stating purpose/context/goals of the assignment?
|
Is my written assignment
a good example of clear UK English (correctly spelled) and of correct Harvard
referencing?
Consider
why/how a student might fail. Are the ‘Essential’ instructions clearly
stated, e.g. use of diagrams, headings? Adapt the Assessment and Grading
Criteria to your needs, i.e. number of
references required, % for creativity, etc.
|
Are the grading
criteria mapped to THIS EXACT TASK? Is there a % allocated for each grading
component, e.g. format, content, evaluation, understanding, researching and Harvard
referencing?
Are my
additional assessment requirements also clearly added to the Assessment and
Grading Criteria sheet?
|
Does my Module
site include examples of work (good, average, weak) plus useful plans,
models, podcasts or YouTube links?
|
Finally, have I
completed this task myself, using any websites I suggested – so I know it
will work!?
|